Children Need Safe, Decent and Affordable Housing
Affordable
housing is critically important to the well being and health of
children and families. Without decent and affordable housing, families
have trouble managing their daily lives and their children’s safety,
health and development suffer. Families who pay more than they can
afford for housing have too little left over for other necessities
such as food, clothing and health care. They may not be able to
pay for transportation and child care, making it harder to go to
work and school each day. As a result families can end up becoming
homeless or living in substandard housing.
According to the most
recent data available from the American Housing Survey, 2.5 million
households with children live in substandard housing, 741,000 of
which live in severely substandard housing. In Minnesota, almost 300,000 low-income households are living
in unaffordable housing. On any given night in Minnesota more than 20,000 people are homeless or precariously housed and over
3,000 are children.
One study found that when parents
who are former welfare recipients can not pay their rent, and move
frequently their children were twice as likely to change schools
in the prior six months as were comparable families with less housing
need.
As was also demonstrated
by the Kids Mobility Project, completed in 1999 by the Family Housing
Fund and other partners, children who move frequently tend to do
worse in school.
The goal of the Kid’s Mobility Project was to provide
sound information from which implications and recommendations could
emerge for policies and programs that will help stabilize children
and families in Minneapolis. The results confirmed the researchers’ suspicions
that frequent moves affect school performance and that poor
housing and family instability lead to frequent residential moves.
Among the findings are:
Housing
Costs Affect Health and Nutrition:
Parents under economic stress are frequently unable to provide
adequate physical care, including nutrition, and they may be too
preoccupied to provide the nurturing and support their children
need to form secure attachments, especially at young ages. When too much of the family income is spent
on housing, parents are forced to skimp on food, and children
suffer from poor nutrition, which can lead to chronic health problems
and decreased school performance.
Unstable
Housing and Child Health:
Inadequate housing often poses health risks for children who live
there. These risks may include asthma, lead poisoning, mold allergies,
increased respiratory or other infections, or diseases carried
by cockroaches or other pests. Health risks are particularly problematic
in substandard housing, which is often the only option for families
at the lowest income levels.
Unstable
Housing and Child School Performance:
Insecure housing
and frequent mobility have been shown to result in frequent absences
and poorer school performance. When children don’t have stable
and secure shelter, they are much less able to learn than children
who do. With reading and math performance lower, their ability
to succeed in high stakes testing will be impaired. Overall literacy
is also impaired.
Unstable
Housing and Parenting Challenges:
Parents struggling to provide adequate housing may be unable
to give their children the kind of support they need to learn
well, and do not maintain connections with school, read to the
children, provide consistent support for homework, a positive
home learning environment, or appropriate modeling.
Economic
Stress and Sobriety:
A correlation has been found between economic stress in the
family and negative behaviors such as alcoholism in adolescents
in the families affected.
Poverty
and an Unstable Neighborhood: When
people live in neighborhoods of concentrated poverty, they are
at greater risk of becoming involved in criminal behavior, including
violent crime and drug use. This is due in part to the lack
of role models and other stabilizing influences.
|
|
“The loss of one child’s
potential... is only a shadow of the loss to that child’s
potential as an educated, productive world
citizen. Our businesses have one less skilled worker. Our communities
have one less person to contribute time, energy and money to sustain
a high quality of life. Our state has one less citizen to engage
meaningfully in public decision-making. There is one more adult
at risk of... straying into crime or
requiring continuing public subsidy.”
-Rip Rapson, President,
The McKnight Foundation
"When children have a stable
home, they do better in school, have fewer health problems,
and are more likely to pursue higher education and be a part of
a healthy workforce."
-Children, Youth and Family Consortium, University
of Minnesota
“When housing
needs are appropriately met, children are more likely to be healthy
and perform well in school and parents are more likely to be productive
members of a strong workforce.”
-Sandra Christenson, A Family View of Mobility
Among Low-Income Children
“When too much family income is spent on housing,
parents are forced to skimp on food, and children suffer from poor
nutrition, which can lead to chronic health problems and decreased
school performance.”
-Children, Youth and Family Consortium, University
of Minnesota
“Homeownership
has been found to encourage stronger families, more success in K-12
school performance, and greater success later in life.”
-Alan Scholttmann, University of Tennessee
“Inadequate
housing often poses health risks for children, including asthma,
lead poisoning, mold allergies, increased respiratory or other infections,
and injuries from unsafe conditions.”
-Children, Youth and Family Consortium, University
of Minnesota
|
|
Homeownership
Homeownership has been found to encourage stronger
families, more success in k-12 school performance and greater success
later in life. Compared to the children of renters (of the
same age, income, race, etc.), the children of homeowners are:
25%
more likely to graduate from high school
;
116%
more likely to graduate from college
;
20%
less likely to become teenage mothers
; and
59%
more likely to own a home within 10 years of moving
from their parent’s household
.
Children of homeowners have been shown to have higher
math and reading scores
, fewer behavioral problems
, and are less likely
to have alcohol and substance-abuse problems
.
Homeownership also builds wealth for low-income families.
GMHF’s research
reveals that low income
“starter home” buyers in Greater Minnesota will accumulate more
than $90,000 in home equity during the first ten years of homeownership
and over $300,000 of equity over 30 years of homeownership. This
new wealth will serve the family by providing a family built safety
net when health or other problems arise, provide for first-generation
college graduates and business ownership, and provide retirement savings.
Housing
for Families with Children Is Important to the General Public
In 2003 the Fannie Mae Foundation, with Peter D. Hart
Research Associates, conducted an extensive national public opinion
survey to probe Americans’ perceptions of affordable housing and instruct
the Foundation and other organizations on the best means of creating
a favorable environment for affordable housing. One aim of the research
is to identify concerns that resonate with the public and therefore
have the potential to move the affordable housing issue off the nation’s
back burner. Hart consistently found that the public responds strongly
when presented with evidence that the lack of affordable quality housing
disrupts family life and unfairly burdens hard-working men and women.
People care about families and children, not abstract entities like
communities or business sectors. Two statistically based statements
that strongly ignited public concern are:
Families
Unfairly Strained: No
parent in America working full time at minimum wage can afford a two-bedroom
apartment renting at the “fair market rent’ without overburdening
the rest of the family budget (of the respondents, 75 % agreed that
this a big or fairly big problem).
Too
Many Pay Too Much: There
has been a 68% increase in just the past four years in the number
of working-class families who spend more than half of their income
on housing. (Seventy-eight percent of the respondents agreed that
this is a very big or fairly big problem).
Other Survey Statistics showed that the public feels
housing costs should not:
…
Prevent Education or Retirement: Of the people interviewed, 79% were concerned a great
deal or a fair amount by families having to spend so much of their
incomes on housing that they cannot save for retirement or for their
children’s education.
…
Prevent Meeting Other Basic Expenses:
76% of respondents were concerned a great deal or fair amount by
families having to spend so much of their income on housing that
they have to struggle to meet their other expenses. [23]
… Prevent
Spending Time with Children:
Of the respondents, 69% were concerned a great deal or a fair amount
by two other issues – families having to spend time away from children
because of long commutes and families with children having to live
in unsafe or crowded conditions to be close to jobs.
|